Good smells prove little. Street food can carry disease-causing microorganisms without any detectable change in flavor or aroma, because the organisms responsible for illness need not produce the compounds associated with spoilage. The nose offers reassurance. Yet that reassurance answers a different question: whether food smells appetizing, not whether a serving contains enough pathogens to make someone sick.
Freshness is no defense. Although spoilage bacteria can generate unpleasant odors as they break food down, pathogens such as Salmonella may be present without announcing themselves through the senses. Appearance offers little protection. Cross-contamination can transfer microorganisms from raw ingredients, hands or utensils onto cooked food, including food that looked perfectly acceptable when it left the heat. Warmth can invite trouble. When food remains at temperatures that support bacterial growth, organisms can multiply, while certain bacteria can also produce toxins that ordinary reheating may not reliably destroy.
The better test happens elsewhere. Rather than treating a fragrant grill as evidence of safety, diners should favor stalls where food is cooked thoroughly, served promptly and protected from contact with raw ingredients. Clean hands deserve attention. So do utensils reserved for cooked food, safe water and refrigeration for ingredients that require it, although visible cleanliness alone cannot establish microbiological safety. A taste proves nothing. Not in the first delicious mouthful, which may conceal contamination as neatly as an empty plate conceals the meal, does safety reveal itself.